but its not easy.I think too there can be a misconception about what people are conceiving in the game as reaction time. Not because the attacks are faster, but because you wont know the animations and what to expect.I average 170-180ms, maybe I could go a little lower, 160 at best, but 100ms seems unrealistic to me. You currently have javascript disabled. Hope that makes sense.I'd agree with most of these points, but not will all of them.Regarding the continuous practice, It's seen in certain sports such as badminton, that reacting just within the limit of your reactions, or just outside of it has some effect on reaction times.I'd theorize that holding a very narrow angle, or trying to pick mid without wallbanging could improve this in the same way.Because you attune your mind and body to not hesitate when you register movement. Now, keep in mind, as this tool is dependent on computer hardware, your peripherals might affect your score more than you might think. However, later I found out there do exist very few ppl with 100 ms reaction time on human benchmark. The latest installment to the Counter-Strike franchise maintains a healthy, ever-intensifying competitive scene alongside a growing casual playerbase.Press J to jump to the feed. I'd guess at 20-40ms due to the fact that I'm still not very fit, I don't get quite enough sleep, and that I still feel a bit of a disconnect. I've hit a few picks through D2 mid lately as a result, (crosshair center of gap, not to the side as a test.) The score is shown with CPS (click per second). (Obviously it takes training to get them to this point)Piracy is fun until you lose a hand. In this case, the lesser the score is, the higher is your response time. I don't think you'll get someone that has 100ms reaction time consistently on For Honor, there is much more information to process than a change of color.I am absolute garbage on that shit, more than 300ms, but I can parry 500ms top lights, but only top, because of warden, orochis, lb and kensei. But I haven't actually seen any data to support this, only logic.As it stands I believe you can improve your reaction time through a multitude of aspects (I've noticed significant improvements over the last 2 years in simply playing a style that requires fringe level reactions) but its always good to hear others thoughts.Reaction time in such a benchmark doesn't really tell too much about how fast you react in the game. I cancel my parrys all the time because i miss read, and it's NOT 100msI think he's probably talking about cancelling your parry after you attempt it thinking the opponent's going for a light attack but actually went for a heavy instead. You start by clicking anywhere inside the blue box. How much more can I improve?
but its not easy.I think too there can be a misconception about what people are conceiving in the game as reaction time. Not because the attacks are faster, but because you wont know the animations and what to expect.I average 170-180ms, maybe I could go a little lower, 160 at best, but 100ms seems unrealistic to me. You currently have javascript disabled. Hope that makes sense.I'd agree with most of these points, but not will all of them.Regarding the continuous practice, It's seen in certain sports such as badminton, that reacting just within the limit of your reactions, or just outside of it has some effect on reaction times.I'd theorize that holding a very narrow angle, or trying to pick mid without wallbanging could improve this in the same way.Because you attune your mind and body to not hesitate when you register movement. Now, keep in mind, as this tool is dependent on computer hardware, your peripherals might affect your score more than you might think. However, later I found out there do exist very few ppl with 100 ms reaction time on human benchmark. The latest installment to the Counter-Strike franchise maintains a healthy, ever-intensifying competitive scene alongside a growing casual playerbase.Press J to jump to the feed. I'd guess at 20-40ms due to the fact that I'm still not very fit, I don't get quite enough sleep, and that I still feel a bit of a disconnect. I've hit a few picks through D2 mid lately as a result, (crosshair center of gap, not to the side as a test.) The score is shown with CPS (click per second). (Obviously it takes training to get them to this point)Piracy is fun until you lose a hand. In this case, the lesser the score is, the higher is your response time. I don't think you'll get someone that has 100ms reaction time consistently on For Honor, there is much more information to process than a change of color.I am absolute garbage on that shit, more than 300ms, but I can parry 500ms top lights, but only top, because of warden, orochis, lb and kensei. But I haven't actually seen any data to support this, only logic.As it stands I believe you can improve your reaction time through a multitude of aspects (I've noticed significant improvements over the last 2 years in simply playing a style that requires fringe level reactions) but its always good to hear others thoughts.Reaction time in such a benchmark doesn't really tell too much about how fast you react in the game. I cancel my parrys all the time because i miss read, and it's NOT 100msI think he's probably talking about cancelling your parry after you attempt it thinking the opponent's going for a light attack but actually went for a heavy instead. You start by clicking anywhere inside the blue box. How much more can I improve?
but its not easy.I think too there can be a misconception about what people are conceiving in the game as reaction time. Not because the attacks are faster, but because you wont know the animations and what to expect.I average 170-180ms, maybe I could go a little lower, 160 at best, but 100ms seems unrealistic to me. You currently have javascript disabled. Hope that makes sense.I'd agree with most of these points, but not will all of them.Regarding the continuous practice, It's seen in certain sports such as badminton, that reacting just within the limit of your reactions, or just outside of it has some effect on reaction times.I'd theorize that holding a very narrow angle, or trying to pick mid without wallbanging could improve this in the same way.Because you attune your mind and body to not hesitate when you register movement. Now, keep in mind, as this tool is dependent on computer hardware, your peripherals might affect your score more than you might think. However, later I found out there do exist very few ppl with 100 ms reaction time on human benchmark. The latest installment to the Counter-Strike franchise maintains a healthy, ever-intensifying competitive scene alongside a growing casual playerbase.Press J to jump to the feed. I'd guess at 20-40ms due to the fact that I'm still not very fit, I don't get quite enough sleep, and that I still feel a bit of a disconnect. I've hit a few picks through D2 mid lately as a result, (crosshair center of gap, not to the side as a test.) The score is shown with CPS (click per second). (Obviously it takes training to get them to this point)Piracy is fun until you lose a hand. In this case, the lesser the score is, the higher is your response time. I don't think you'll get someone that has 100ms reaction time consistently on For Honor, there is much more information to process than a change of color.I am absolute garbage on that shit, more than 300ms, but I can parry 500ms top lights, but only top, because of warden, orochis, lb and kensei. But I haven't actually seen any data to support this, only logic.As it stands I believe you can improve your reaction time through a multitude of aspects (I've noticed significant improvements over the last 2 years in simply playing a style that requires fringe level reactions) but its always good to hear others thoughts.Reaction time in such a benchmark doesn't really tell too much about how fast you react in the game. I cancel my parrys all the time because i miss read, and it's NOT 100msI think he's probably talking about cancelling your parry after you attempt it thinking the opponent's going for a light attack but actually went for a heavy instead. You start by clicking anywhere inside the blue box. How much more can I improve?
but its not easy.I think too there can be a misconception about what people are conceiving in the game as reaction time. Not because the attacks are faster, but because you wont know the animations and what to expect.I average 170-180ms, maybe I could go a little lower, 160 at best, but 100ms seems unrealistic to me. You currently have javascript disabled. Hope that makes sense.I'd agree with most of these points, but not will all of them.Regarding the continuous practice, It's seen in certain sports such as badminton, that reacting just within the limit of your reactions, or just outside of it has some effect on reaction times.I'd theorize that holding a very narrow angle, or trying to pick mid without wallbanging could improve this in the same way.Because you attune your mind and body to not hesitate when you register movement. Now, keep in mind, as this tool is dependent on computer hardware, your peripherals might affect your score more than you might think. However, later I found out there do exist very few ppl with 100 ms reaction time on human benchmark. The latest installment to the Counter-Strike franchise maintains a healthy, ever-intensifying competitive scene alongside a growing casual playerbase.Press J to jump to the feed. I'd guess at 20-40ms due to the fact that I'm still not very fit, I don't get quite enough sleep, and that I still feel a bit of a disconnect. I've hit a few picks through D2 mid lately as a result, (crosshair center of gap, not to the side as a test.) The score is shown with CPS (click per second). (Obviously it takes training to get them to this point)Piracy is fun until you lose a hand. In this case, the lesser the score is, the higher is your response time. I don't think you'll get someone that has 100ms reaction time consistently on For Honor, there is much more information to process than a change of color.I am absolute garbage on that shit, more than 300ms, but I can parry 500ms top lights, but only top, because of warden, orochis, lb and kensei. But I haven't actually seen any data to support this, only logic.As it stands I believe you can improve your reaction time through a multitude of aspects (I've noticed significant improvements over the last 2 years in simply playing a style that requires fringe level reactions) but its always good to hear others thoughts.Reaction time in such a benchmark doesn't really tell too much about how fast you react in the game. I cancel my parrys all the time because i miss read, and it's NOT 100msI think he's probably talking about cancelling your parry after you attempt it thinking the opponent's going for a light attack but actually went for a heavy instead. You start by clicking anywhere inside the blue box. How much more can I improve?
If you're in a 1vX, you have to process what your 2nd opponent is doing.Once to commit to a decision, you have to account for the time it takes for your brain to send information to your fingers, and also the time it takes for your finger to push the button on your controller. Verbal was surprising.I have terrible memorization skills, so I only did the reaction time one. Sound and footsteps also help with prefiring, so you end up with shots that look inhumanly fast but are more a prefire kind of thing.I score shit on those things but I think I do pretty good ingameAnd then of course there's the question, if pro's have better reaction times, is it because they've practised so much or did they have better reflexes all along and that's part of what helped them go pro?Reaction is the one thing, coordination is the other...Together they can be pretty impressive.
How quickly can you hit all the targets? I kicked ass at that.I feel like I cheated on the verbal memory when they use words such as "bridgehead" and "skinful". I found this site called Human Benchmark where you can do Number Memory, Reaction Time, Verbal Memory, and Visual Memory. If you want, you can keep track of your scores, and see your full history of reaction times. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcutsCookies help us deliver our Services. I feel like I sucked at number memory.
but its not easy.I think too there can be a misconception about what people are conceiving in the game as reaction time. Not because the attacks are faster, but because you wont know the animations and what to expect.I average 170-180ms, maybe I could go a little lower, 160 at best, but 100ms seems unrealistic to me. You currently have javascript disabled. Hope that makes sense.I'd agree with most of these points, but not will all of them.Regarding the continuous practice, It's seen in certain sports such as badminton, that reacting just within the limit of your reactions, or just outside of it has some effect on reaction times.I'd theorize that holding a very narrow angle, or trying to pick mid without wallbanging could improve this in the same way.Because you attune your mind and body to not hesitate when you register movement. Now, keep in mind, as this tool is dependent on computer hardware, your peripherals might affect your score more than you might think. However, later I found out there do exist very few ppl with 100 ms reaction time on human benchmark. The latest installment to the Counter-Strike franchise maintains a healthy, ever-intensifying competitive scene alongside a growing casual playerbase.Press J to jump to the feed. I'd guess at 20-40ms due to the fact that I'm still not very fit, I don't get quite enough sleep, and that I still feel a bit of a disconnect. I've hit a few picks through D2 mid lately as a result, (crosshair center of gap, not to the side as a test.) The score is shown with CPS (click per second). (Obviously it takes training to get them to this point)Piracy is fun until you lose a hand. In this case, the lesser the score is, the higher is your response time. I don't think you'll get someone that has 100ms reaction time consistently on For Honor, there is much more information to process than a change of color.I am absolute garbage on that shit, more than 300ms, but I can parry 500ms top lights, but only top, because of warden, orochis, lb and kensei. But I haven't actually seen any data to support this, only logic.As it stands I believe you can improve your reaction time through a multitude of aspects (I've noticed significant improvements over the last 2 years in simply playing a style that requires fringe level reactions) but its always good to hear others thoughts.Reaction time in such a benchmark doesn't really tell too much about how fast you react in the game. I cancel my parrys all the time because i miss read, and it's NOT 100msI think he's probably talking about cancelling your parry after you attempt it thinking the opponent's going for a light attack but actually went for a heavy instead. You start by clicking anywhere inside the blue box. How much more can I improve?
